Back to Jax Says

Jax Says

I Am Not A Developer, But I Am Building AI Tools I Used To Only Imagine

For years, I had ideas for tools I wanted to build. Not giant software platforms. Not complicated systems made for everyone. Just practical tools...

Apr 28, 202613 min read
AI StrategyProductivity
I Am Not A Developer, But I Am Building AI Tools I Used To Only Imagine

For years, I had ideas for tools I wanted to build.

Not giant software platforms. Not complicated systems made for everyone. Just practical tools for real problems I kept seeing in my own work and in conversations with clients.

A better way to follow up with leads. A better way to organize client conversations. A better way to research complex AI regulation. A better way to create visual concepts. A better way to turn a messy workflow into something simple, useful, and repeatable.

The problem was always the same.

I am not a traditional developer.

I could describe the idea. I could see the workflow in my head. I could explain where the friction was. I could even imagine how the tool should feel for the person using it. But turning that idea into working software was another story.

You needed code. You needed structure. You needed someone who understood technical setup, folders, servers, errors, frameworks, and all the hidden steps that happen before a tool works.

That is where many entrepreneurs stop.

Not because the idea is bad. Not because the problem is small. But because the distance between “I wish this existed” and “I can actually use this” feels too big.

That distance is now smaller than it has ever been.

AI Did Not Make Me A Developer. It Made Me More Capable.

I still do not call myself a developer. But I now build.

That is the important part.

With AI, Codex, and a clear way of working, I started turning ideas into real tools. Not by asking random questions. Not by expecting AI to magically understand my business. But by treating AI as a technical partner.

I define the problem. I explain the workflow. I test the result. I correct what is wrong. I push the system again. I improve the prompt. I check the logic. I keep going until the tool starts matching the way I actually work.

That changed everything for me.

Before, I had to adapt my work to existing tools. Now, I can start shaping tools around my own work.

That is a different mindset.

And I think this is one of the biggest opportunities for entrepreneurs, consultants, agencies, and small teams right now.

The Real Secret Is Not The Tool

Many people ask the wrong question first.

They ask:

“Should I use ChatGPT?”
“Should I use Claude?”
“Should I use Gemini?”
“Which AI tool is the best?”

I understand the question, but that is not where I would start.

The real secret is not the tool. The real secret is knowing what you actually need.

That sounds simple, but most people skip it. They test AI tools before they understand the problem. They ask for automation before they understand the workflow. They ask for better output before they define what good output looks like.

Then they get average results.

AI works best when it is connected to your own expertise. If you know your business, your clients, your process, and your problems, you can guide the AI much better. You can see when the answer is wrong. You can correct the direction. You can add context. You can turn your own knowledge into a workflow, a document, a system, an automation, or even a working tool.

But there is one skill people still underestimate.

Prompting.

Not prompting as a trick. Not prompting as a list of magic words. Real prompting means knowing how to explain the mission, the context, the constraints, the examples, the expected result, and the standard of quality.

When you know how to prompt properly, the difference in output is huge.

This is what I learned the hard way.

The first setup is often painful when you are not a developer. You do not know where to begin. You do not know how to structure the project. You do not know what to ask first. You do not know what matters technically and what does not. You can waste hours going in circles because the idea is clear in your head, but not clear enough for AI to execute it properly.

For me, the method became very clear:

  1. Know what you need.
  2. Build from your own expertise.
  3. Learn how to prompt with enough clarity to get strong results.

When those three things come together, AI stops being a toy and starts becoming a serious business tool.

What I Started Building

Over time, I realized I was not building one isolated app.

I was building a work system.

A research layer.
A business layer.
A creative layer.
An execution layer.
A public layer.

Each part solves a different problem, but together they support the same mission: work faster, think clearer, reduce friction, and turn ideas into useful systems.

An AI Act Research Graph

One of the first projects I worked on was an AI Act research graph.

The idea came from a real problem: AI regulation is complex, and most people read it as separate documents. But regulation does not work in isolation. A law connects to guidance. Guidance connects to risks. Risks connect to obligations. Obligations connect to business decisions.

So the goal was not to collect more information. The goal was to connect the right information.

This matters because most companies do not need more AI noise. They need clarity. They need to know what applies to them, what changed, what matters now, and what they should do next.

A graph-based system made sense because it helps people see relationships instead of reading scattered documents one by one. It turns information into something easier to explore, question, and act on.

That lesson applies far beyond regulation.

More data is rarely the answer. Better structure is usually the answer.

ClientFlow: A CRM Built Around Real Follow-Up

Another project was ClientFlow.

This came from a practical business problem.

When you speak with many clients, receive messages, follow up with prospects, manage opportunities, and try to remember every conversation, things can get lost.

A name. A promise. A need. A next step. A good opportunity.

Most entrepreneurs do not lose clients because they are bad at what they do. They lose clients because the follow-up is not structured enough.

That is why I wanted a system that helps manage leads, conversations, and next actions in a clearer way.

A CRM is not just a contact list. A good CRM is a memory system for your business. It helps you remember who needs attention, what happened, where the opportunity is, and what should happen next.

The point was not to build another generic CRM. The point was to create something closer to how I actually work.

That is where AI-assisted building becomes interesting. You are no longer limited to asking, “Which tool already exists?” You can start asking, “What would the right tool look like for my workflow?”

A Moodboard System For Creative AI Work

I also worked on a moodboard system for creative production.

This came from another frustration.

AI image and video tools are powerful, but the workflow is often messy. People jump straight into prompts, generate a lot of images, and then wonder why the result does not feel consistent.

But creative work needs more than a prompt.

It needs references. It needs visual direction. It needs consistency. It needs characters that stay recognizable. It needs scenes that fit together. It needs structure before generation.

That is what the moodboard system is about.

It is not only about creating images. It is about helping structure creative thinking before producing the final result.

This is one of the biggest lessons I learned while building with AI: the best results usually come before the prompt is written. They come from the thinking, the references, the structure, and the decisions you make first.

A Simple Launcher To Remove Technical Friction

One of the smaller tools was a simple launcher.

Nothing fancy. Just a way to reopen and run projects with one click.

But for me, this mattered.

When you are not a developer, small technical steps create friction. Folders, commands, servers, ports, terminals, setup instructions, errors. Every small step slows you down.

So I wanted something simple.

If a project exists, I should be able to open it and run it without remembering technical commands.

That is also a business lesson.

Sometimes the best AI opportunity is not a huge transformation. Sometimes it is removing the small friction that slows people down every day.

The Website And The Public Layer

I also worked on the website and the way I explain what I do.

Because building tools is one part of the work. Explaining the value is another.

People need to understand what you do, who it helps, why it matters, and what the next step is. A product can have deep logic behind it, but the public message must be simple.

This is also where many businesses struggle with AI.

They have experiments. They have tools. They have ideas. But they do not have a clear story.

Without a clear story, people do not act.

That is why AI work needs two sides: the system behind the scenes and the message people understand in front of them.

Both matter.

“Should I Stay On ChatGPT Or Use Claude?”

This is one of the questions clients ask me all the time.

“Should I stay on ChatGPT?”
“Should I use Claude?”
“Which one is better?”

My answer is usually the same:

Use what suits your work best.

There is no perfect answer for everyone. Some people prefer Claude for writing, long documents, or the way the conversation feels. Some people prefer ChatGPT because they already use it every day, because the ecosystem fits their work, or because they want to move into building, automation, and technical workflows.

I do not think this should become a fan debate.

The better question is not, “Which tool is best?”

The better question is, “Which tool helps me get the best result with the least friction?”

That being said, Codex changed the conversation for me.

Before, AI helped me think, write, summarize, structure, and brainstorm. Now, with Codex, I can go further. I can work on tools, test ideas, improve workflows, and move closer to real software.

That is a different level of usefulness.

My practical observation is this: every time competition becomes strong, OpenAI tends to respond fast. I do not say that as a permanent rule. I say it as something I see again and again in the market.

But I still tell clients to test what works for them.

For writing, compare tools.
For research, compare tools.
For content, compare tools.
For internal workflows, compare tools.

But if you want to build systems, automate parts of your work, create internal tools, or turn your own process into software, ChatGPT with Codex deserves serious attention.

The question is no longer only:

“Which AI gives the best answer?”

The better question is:

“Which AI helps me build the best result?”

What I See With Clients

Most clients do not need a technical explanation first.

They need someone to look at their work and ask better questions.

What do you repeat every week?
Where do you lose time?
Where do clients wait too long?
Where does your team copy and paste too much?
Where is knowledge stuck in someone’s head?
Where do mistakes keep happening?
Where could one simple tool change the way you work?

That is where I usually start.

Not with the tool. With the work.

Because AI only becomes useful when it connects to a real process.

A business does not need AI for the sake of AI. A business needs better follow-up, better decisions, better content, better onboarding, better reporting, better structure, or less manual work.

AI becomes valuable when it serves one of those goals.

Why This Matters For Entrepreneurs And Small Teams

Entrepreneurs often know their problems better than anyone.

They know what is slow. They know what is repetitive. They know what clients ask all the time. They know where the team loses energy. They know what should exist, even when they cannot build it yet.

Before, that knowledge often stayed stuck in someone’s head.

Now, it can become a system.

You do not need to become a full-time developer. But you do need to become precise.

Precise about the problem. Precise about the result. Precise about the workflow. Precise about what should be automated and what should stay human.

That is where the real value appears.

AI does not remove the need for expertise. It increases the value of expertise.

Because when you know your field, your clients, your process, and your problems, AI can help you turn that knowledge into something practical.

A workflow.
A prompt system.
A client process.
A content engine.
A research assistant.
An internal tool.
A first version of software.

I Learned The Hard Way

I do not say this because I read one article about AI.

I say it because I spent time testing, failing, correcting, rebuilding, and learning the hard way.

I know what it feels like to have a strong idea but not know where to begin. I know what it feels like to get stuck in technical setup. I know what it feels like to ask AI for help and receive output that looks good but does not actually work. I know how frustrating it is when you can see the business value, but the first steps feel unclear.

That is why I now help clients start in a better way.

Not by selling them a tool. Not by forcing them into one platform. But by helping them understand what is worth building, what can be simplified, and where AI can create the fastest practical result.

Sometimes the answer is a better prompt. Sometimes it is a workflow. Sometimes it is a custom GPT. Sometimes it is an automation. Sometimes it is a small internal tool. Sometimes it is simply a clearer process.

The goal is not to use more AI.

The goal is to make your work better.

Final Thought

AI did not replace my work. It expanded what I can do.

It helped me move from ideas to systems. From questions to workflows. From manual work to tools. From “I wish this existed” to “let’s build a first version.”

That is why I believe this moment matters for small teams, consultants, agencies, and entrepreneurs.

The winners will not be the people who test every new AI tool for fun. The winners will be the people who connect AI to real business problems.

The people who ask better questions. The people who structure their expertise. The people who improve their workflows. The people who build around what they already know.

Because AI is not only about answers anymore.

It is about execution.

And execution is where business value appears.

If you are wondering where AI could save you time, improve your work, or help you build a tool around your own process, I can help you see it clearly.

I do not start with the tool. I start with your work.

Get in touch?

https://bit.ly/Jax15m

See other posts

AI & Art

As a creative artist, I am constantly in awe of the ever-evolving landscape of technology and...