Governance · 30 Sep 2026 · 13:00 CEST
Things are changing behind the scenes, so you must decide: do you want human civil servants or AI bots? | The civil servant

Publisher preview · OZZZER analysis pending editorial review.
PUBLISHER ARTICLE PREVIEW
From the original article
Rapidly expanding AI use within the government is numbing departments to its profound threats. And try arguing with a faceless digital bureaucrat
Another day, another apocalyptic warning about the likelihood that rampantly uncontrollable artificial intelligence will solve all of our problems, including the problem of being alive.
Hot on the heels of disgruntled Anthropic researchers announcing the end of civilisation by 2030, we’ve now had the portentously named Hugging Face incident, as well as the Australian government’s grim discovery of a rogue AI’s attack on its Medicare website. Swarms of experts are now falling over each other to warn us that much, much worse is on the way.
Thank God, then, that PM Uncle Andy has thrust Britain on to the bleeding edge of the fight against the rise of the self-improving machines. Except he hasn’t. Not really.
Yes, Burnham went to the United Nations and risked enraging the Orange One with talk of Britain’s prospects of leading the drawing-up of international rules for AI. Slightly awkwardly, however, one of Burnham’s first acts after sweeping into office was to abolish the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT), the very department that had been leading work on AI safety.
It’s a move that the Institute for Government warns will cause “real harm” and which former government AI adviser Matt Clifford has said “wastes time and energy that’s desperately needed for the actual substance”.
Isn’t there something gloriously British about all this? Having failed thus far to regulate the technology effectively at home, we are going to world-beatingly coordinate its regulation everywhere else. Whatever it is, it doesn’t quite feel like the response of a state gripped by existential urgency.
But perhaps that is because all of us – government ministers included – have already become desensitised to the risk of AImageddon. You can get used to anything. Sure, if one industry insider inadvertently leaks
Source
Guardian AI · 30 Sep 2026 · 13:00 CEST
Open the original at Guardian AI ↗